How Longs It Takes to Get Review in Pest Management Science
Abstract
Earlier models of integrated pest management (IPM) focused on ecological aspects of pest direction. With the contempo developments in agricultural technology, modernistic communication tools, changing consumer trends, increased sensation for sustainably produced food systems, and globalization of trade and travel, there seems to be a need to revisit the IPM paradigm as appropriate for mod times. A new model, built on earlier models based on ecological and economic aspects, is expanded and reconfigured to include management, concern, and sustainability aspects and emphasize the importance of research and outreach. The management attribute contains four components of IPM that address the pest direction options, the noesis and resources to develop management strategies, the management of information and making timely decisions, and the broadcasting or sharing of information. With the business aspect that includes the producer, consumer, and seller, and the sustainability aspect that covers economic viability, environmental safety, and social acceptability, the new model presents the human, environmental, social, and economic factors that influence the food production.
The concept of integrated pest direction (IPM), a sustainable strategy for managing pests, has been in practice for a long time. Although multiple sources define IPM in different ways, previous models primarily focused on the ecological, and to some extent on the evolutionary, aspects of pest direction (Peterson et al. 2018). A contempo IPM pyramid presented by Stenberg (2017) identified a lack of a holistic IPM arroyo that uses both traditional and modern tools. However, his conceptual framework mainly dealt with the ecological aspects of pest management with an emphasis on interdisciplinary research arroyo. Several reports indicated that IPM implementation depends on numerous factors including the level of pedagogy, economical and social weather condition, ecology awareness, rational thinking, moral values, regulatory aspects, authorities policies, availability of IPM tools, extension instruction, consumer preference, and retail marketing (Parsa et al. 2014, Lefebvre et al. 2015, Jayasooriya and Aheeyar 2016, Rezaei et al. 2019). Nevertheless, there is no IPM model that encompasses all these factors and provides a comprehensive description.
The estimation of IPM also varies among those who develop, promote, or practice IPM strategies. For example, co-ordinate to the United states of america Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS 2018), IPM is a sustainable, science-based, decision-making procedure that combines biological, cultural, physical, and chemical tools to place, manage, and reduce risk from pests and pest management tools and strategies in a way that minimizes overall economic, health, and environmental risks. Several other definitions also focus on minimizing or eliminating the reliance on chemic control options, adopting a number of other options with the accent on environmental and human wellness. However, some practitioners interpret IPM as rotating chemicals from dissimilar mode of action groups to maintain pest control efficacy and reduce pesticide resistance with an emphasis on reducing pest damage. These definitions and interpretations correspond a variety of objectives and strategies for managing pests including vertebrate and invertebrate pests, diseases, and weeds. IPM is not a principle that strictly and uniformly applies to every situation, simply a philosophy that can guide the practitioner to employ information technology as appropriate for their situation. For example, host plant resistance is effectively used in some crops with pest and disease resistant or tolerant varieties, just not in other crops. Pheromones are widely used for mating disruption, mass trapping, or monitoring of certain lepidopteran and coleopteran pests, just not for several hemipteran pests. Biological control is ordinarily used for greenhouse pests, merely not to the same extent in the field. Mechanical tools such as bug vacuums are used in high-value crops such as strawberry, but they are not an economic option in non-specialty crops and are non carbon efficient because of fossil fuel consumption. While chemic pesticides should be used as the last resort, in principle, sometimes they are the first line of defense to prevent the area-broad spread of sure endemic or invasive pests and diseases or to protect the seed and transplants from common and persistent pest issues. Seed treatment with chemical pesticides, e.g., has become a popular prophylactic measure out in many crops in recent years.
Crop production is an fine art, a science, and an enterprise, and past adding environmental and social factors, IPM—an arroyo used in crop production—is as well influenced by a number of factors. Each grower has their ain strategy for producing crops, minimizing losses, and making a profit in a mode that is acceptable to the retailer, safe for the consumers, and less disruptive to the environment. In other words, IPM is an approach to manage pests in an economically viable, socially acceptable, and environmentally safety fashion. Keeping this short, but complex, definition in mind and considering recent advances in crop production and protection, communication engineering science, and globalization of agriculture and commerce, a new image of IPM (Fig. 1) is presented with its management, business, and sustainability aspects having the following directly or indirect objectives:
Fig. 1.
New IPM image with its various components and influencing factors for economically viable, socially acceptable, and environmentally safety pest management.
Fig. 1.
New IPM prototype with its various components and influencing factors for economically viable, socially adequate, and environmentally safe pest management.
-
Update the IPM concept every bit advisable for modern times and encourage re-evaluation of what is perceived as sustainable
-
Build consumer confidence and didactics in an IPM-based product organization that is platonic for all crops and situations, ensures global food security, and eliminates food-based social inequality
-
Ensure profitability for the producers while allowing informed consumers, rather than special interest groups or retailers, to make their food option
-
Minimize potential negative bear on of the not-IPM-based conventional practices or those perceived to exist sustainable alternatives on the environment and challenges associated with managing certain pests
Direction Attribute
In that location are iv major components in the new IPM model that accost various pest management options, the knowledge, and resources the grower has to address the pest issue, planning and organization of information to accept advisable management actions, and maintaining good communication to larn and disseminate knowledge virtually pests and their management.
Pest Management
The concept of pest command has changed to pest management over the years knowing that a counterbalanced approach to managing pest populations to levels that practise not cause economic losses is amend than eliminating or eradicating (except for newly introduced invasive pests), for ecology and economic reasons. Although the term command is frequently used in literature and conversations, it more often than not refers to direction. A thorough noesis of full general IPM principles and diverse management options for all possible pest problems is of import equally some are preventive and others are curative. Some of the recommended practices may non be applied in all situations and the grower or the pest control professional has to choose the option(southward) appropriate for their situation. It is also essential to understand inherent and potential interactions among these management options to achieve desired control. The following are common control options that tin can exist used at different stages of crop product to forestall, reduce, or care for pest infestations. Each of them may provide a certain level of command, only their additive effect tin be significant in preventing yield losses.
Host Constitute Resistance
A strategy that involves the use of pest-resistant and pest-tolerant cultivars developed through traditional breeding or genetic engineering (Douglas 2018, Kennedy 2008, Nelson et al. 2018). These cultivars possess physical, morphological, or biochemical characters that reduce the plant'due south attractiveness or suitability for the pest to feed, develop, or reproduce successfully. These cultivars resist or tolerate pest damage and thus reduce the yield losses. This option is the offset line of defense force in IPM.
Cultural Command
Adopting good agronomic practices that avert or reduce pest infestations and harm refers to cultural control. Choosing clean seed or plant material is disquisitional to avoid the chances of introducing pests right from the beginning of the ingather production. Adjusting planting dates can help escape pest occurrence or avoid most vulnerable stages. Early planting of cowpea reduced aphid, thrips, and pod bug infestations in Uganda (Karungi et al. 2000) and the legume pod-borer (Maruca vitrata), the legume flower thrips (Megalurothrips sjostedti), and the pod sucking issues (Clarigralla tomentosicollis) in Nigeria (Asante et al. 2001). Plant density or row spacing will also have an impact on pest infestations. High plant density reduced root maggot (Delia spp.) infestations in canola in Canada (Dosdall et al. 1996) and aphid infestations in cowpea in Republic of uganda (Karungi et al. 2000). Modifying irrigation practices, fertilizer program, and other agronomic practices can create conditions that are less suitable for the pest. Micro-sprinklers are installed on the strawberry beds equally a spider mite command strategy particularly in organic strawberries in California (personal ascertainment). Strawberry plots with micro-sprinklers besides appeared to have less severe powdery mildew (acquired by Podosphaera aphanis) and botrytis fruit rot (acquired by Botrytis cinerea) infections compared with the plots with overhead aluminum sprinklers (Dara et al. 2016). Low potassium content in plants induces jasmonic acrid synthesis in plants and helps with found's ability to withstand insect pests and certain diseases (Davis et al. 2018). Increased plant nitrogen can exacerbate arthropod infestations (Hodson and Lampinen 2018). Loftier (Mitchell et al. 2003) or low nitrogen (Snoeijers et al. 2000) content in the found can likewise contribute to some illness problems. Destroying crop residue and thorough tillage will eliminate breeding sites and control soil-inhabiting stages of the pest. Sanitation practices to remove infected/infested plant cloth, regular cleaning field equipment, fugitive accidental contamination of healthy fields through human activity are too important to prevent the pest spread. For example, winter plowing of orchard floors reduced the pistachio psyllids (Agonoscena pistaciae) overwintering in the foliage litter and weeds in Iran (Mehrnejad 2018). Plowing is also an important control choice to destroy the crop residue and expose the soil-inhabiting stages of several vegetable pests (Kunjwal and Srivastava 2018). Sanitation practices such every bit bagging unmarketable berries or even changing the harvest schedule from every three d to 1–2 d reduced spotted-wing drosophila (Drosophila suzukii) infestations (Leach et al. 2017). Crop rotation with non-host or tolerant crops volition intermission the pest cycles and reduce their buildup year after year. Crop rotation tactic has been used for insect, disease, and weed management in many cropping systems (Ringlet 1963, Wright 1984, Liebman and Dyck 1993, Mohler and Johnson 2009). Intercropping of non-host plants or those that deter pests or using trap crops to divert pests away from the primary ingather are some of the other cultural command strategies in IPM (Pretty and Bharucha 2015, Nielsen et al. 2016).
Biological Control
Natural enemies such every bit predatory arthropods and parasitic wasps can be very effective in causing meaning reductions in pest populations in sure circumstances (Hajek and Eilenberg 2018). Periodical releases of commercially available natural enemies or conserving natural enemy populations by providing refuges or avoiding practices that harm them are some of the common practices to command endemic pests. Biological command has been successfully used in greenhouses (van Lenteren 1988) and specialty crops such as strawberries grown in the field (Zalom et al. 2018). To address invasive pest problems, classical biological control approach is typically used where natural enemies from the native region of the invasive pest are imported, multiplied, and released in the new habitat of the pest (Kenis et al. 2017, Heimpel and Cock 2018). The release of irradiated, sterile insects is some other biological control technique that has been effectively used against a number of pests (Klassen and Curtis 2005).
Behavioral Control
The behavior of the pest can be exploited for its monitoring and control through baits, traps, and mating disruption techniques (Heinz et al. 1992, Shorey and Gerber 1996, Foster and Harris 1997, Vladés et al. 2005, El-Sayed et al. 2009, Morrison et al. 2016). Baits containing poisonous cloth will attract and kill the pests when distributed in the field or placed in traps. Pests are attracted to certain colors, lights, odors of attractants or pheromones. Devices that employ i or more of these can be used to attract, trap or kill pests. Pheromone lures misfile adult insects and disrupt their mating potential, and thus reduce their offspring.
Physical or Mechanical Control
This approach refers to the employ of a multifariousness of physical or mechanical techniques for pest exclusion, trapping (in some cases like to the behavioral control), removal, or destruction (Webb and Linda 1992, Gamliel and Katan 2012, Gogo et al. 2014, Dara et al. 2018). Pest exclusion with netting or row covers, handpicking or vacuuming to remove pests, mechanical tools for weed control, traps for rodent pests, modifying environmental conditions such equally rut or humidity in greenhouses, steam sterilization or solarization, visual or physical bird deterrents such as cogitating cloth or sonic devices are some examples of physical or mechanical control.
Microbial Control
Using entomopathogenic leaner, fungi, microsporidia, nematodes, or viruses, and fermentation byproducts of some microbes confronting arthropod pests, institute parasitic nematodes, and institute pathogens generally come under microbial control (Mankau 1981, Paulitz and Bélanger 2001, Dong and Zhang 2006, Lacey 2017).
Chemical Control
Chemical command typically refers to the apply of synthetic chemic pesticides (Pimental 2009). Nevertheless, to be technically authentic, chemical control should include synthetic chemicals as well equally chemicals of microbial or botanical origin. Although botanical extracts such every bit azadirachtin and pyrethrins, and microbe-derived toxic metabolites such equally avermectin and spinosad are regarded as biologicals (Lasota and Dybas 1991, Sarfraz et al. 2005, Dodia et al. 2010), they are still chemical molecules, similar to synthetic chemicals, and possess many of the human and environmental condom risks as chemical pesticides. Chemical pesticides are categorized into different groups based on their manner of action (IRAC 2018) and rotating chemicals from different mode of activity groups is recommended to reduce the hazard of resistance development (Sparks and Nauen 2015). Government regulations restrict the time and amount of certain chemic pesticides and help mitigate the associated risks.
The new ribonucleic acid interference (RNAi) engineering where double-stranded RNA is applied to silence specific genes in the target insect is considered as biopesticide awarding (Gordon and Waterhouse 2007). Sure biostimulants based on minerals, microbes, found extracts, seaweed or algae impart induced systemic resistance to pests, diseases, and abiotic stressors, merely are applied as amendments without any claims for pest or illness command (Larkin 2008, Vleesschauwer and Höfte 2009, Sharma et al. 2014, López-Bucio et al 2015, Dara 2018a). These new products or technologies can fall into one or more than abovementioned categories of pest direction.
All the pest management options need careful consideration and awarding to avert potential risks. For example, several pests developed resistance to transgenic crops with Bacillus thuringiensis toxic proteins (Tabashnik et al. 2013) and planting non-transgenic plants along with resistant plants has been recommend, among other strategies, to reduce the resistance development (Tang et al. 2001, Huang et al. 2011). The western corn rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera, adapted to the cultural exercise of rotating soybean with corn (Greyness et al. 2013) and gut bacteria, among other factors, appears to facilitate this adaptation (Chu et al. 2013). Pests can likewise develop resistance to botanical and microbial pesticides if they are overused (Dara 2017). While mating disruption is successfully used for controlling several pests, factors such as migration of mated females and alternative mate recruitment strategies of some species could touch the efficacy of this technique (Cardé and Minks 1995). Pesticide resistance in arthropod pests is a longtime trouble in pest management (Georghiou 1983) and one of the key factors for developing IPM strategies. As required by the ingather and pest situation, one or more of the control options tin can be used throughout the product period for effective pest direction. When used finer, nonchemical control options delay, reduce, or eliminate the use of chemic pesticides.
Although pest management decisions are supposed to exist based on economic injury levels and thresholds, in many situations they are either not available, hard to determine, not applicable to all geographic regions or seasons, or existing ones need revalidation (Poston et al. 1983). Some of the established thresholds are also questionable. Because crop production is highly precise due to mod technologies on one paw, too every bit highly variable depending on a myriad of biotic and abiotic factors and the proprietary practices of unlike farming operations, data direction and controlling parts play a critical role in IPM. One cannot offer a one-size-fits-all solution and the pest command efficacy depends on several factors in addition to the choice used.
Knowledge and Resource
The knowledge of various control options, pest biology and damage potential, and suitability of bachelor resource enables the grower to brand a decision appropriate for their situation. Conversations with growers in different parts of United States and other countries revealed that IPM implementation is limited past the lack of sufficient knowledge, resources, or immediate economic benefit. It is as well evident from many conversations with growers and pest command professionals in California that resistance management seen as rotating pesticides among different style of action groups is commonly perceived as IPM, although resistance management is only a part of IPM. IPM implementation is especially a challenge in developing countries or with low-income growers in developed countries. Socio-psychological factors including rational and moral considerations were found to the drivers in IPM implementation in Islamic republic of iran (Rezaei et al. 2019). A survey of vegetable growers in Sri Lanka showed that nearly 50% of them adept agenda-based chemical pesticide applications earlier pest or disease occurrence and only 20% had some understanding of IPM (Jayasooriya and Aheeyar 2016). A survey conducted by Parsa et al. (2014) as well showed that a lack of qualified IPM experts and extension educators was an impediment for IPM implementation in developed countries.
Pest
Identification of the pest, understanding its biology and seasonal population trends, dissentious life stages and their habitats, nature of the impairment and its economical significance, the vulnerability of each life stage for one or more than control options, host preference and alternate hosts, predictability of pest occurrence based on the environment, cropping trends, farming practices, and other influencing factors, and all the related data is critical for identifying an effective command strategy.
Available Control Options
Because not all control options tin can be used confronting every pest, the grower has to choose the ones that are ideal for the situation. For example, systemic insecticides are more effective against pests that mine or diameter into the plant tissue. Pests that follow a detail seasonal blueprint tin can be controlled by adjusting planting dates. Commercially available natural enemies can be released confronting some, while mating disruption works well against others. Entomopathogenic nematodes can be used against sure soil pests, bacteria, and viruses against pests with chewing mouthparts such as Lepidoptera and Coleoptera, while fungi are effective against a diverseness of pests. Although planting alfalfa strips in strawberry fields to concenter and vacuum the western tarnished plant issues, Lygus hesperus, has been recommended every bit an IPM tactic past Swezey et al. (2007), the idea did not have off considering growers were non prepare for such an intercropping arrangement. Growers are reluctant to lose some of the land for alfalfa and concerned that alfalfa might concenter more L. hesperus into strawberry fields. In some areas, where agronomical land is in shortage or at that place is a continuous need for specialty crops, certain IPM practices such as allocating space for natural enemy habitats or crop rotation are non ever possible. For instance, on some farms, strawberries are grown year afterward year without a rotation with vegetables or comprehend crops on the California Central Coast (personal observations).
Tools and Applied science
A particular pest can be controlled by sure options, but they may non all be available in a detail place, for a particular crop, or within the available fiscal means. For example, the release of natural enemies may be possible in high-value specialty crops, only not in large acreage field crops. A particular pesticide might have been registered for a pest on some crops, but not on all. Utilise of netting, row covers, or tractor-mounted vacuums tin can exist constructive, but very expensive limiting their availability to those who can afford.
This is an important component where diagnostic and preventive or curative decisions are made based on available and affordable control options. With more regulations on pesticide use and a reduction in the number of active ingredients in some crops, there is a higher emphasis on improve understanding of available control options (Hillocks 2012). Regulatory guidelines that limit the use of sure pesticides or promote the use of others tin accept a major influence on IPM implementation. Many countries take phased out broad-spectrum pesticides and fumigants. Recent concern for pollinator health has also led to restrictions on the use of certain pesticides.
While these factors in the knowledge and resources component cover the implementation office of IPM, having sufficient resources to develop IPM strategies is a critical part in the whole equation that is often ignored. Shortage of IPM specialists, limited financial resources for research and extension, and inherent challenges in conducting fourth dimension-consuming applied agronomical research are some of the hurdles in developing and disseminating IPM strategies. Also often, many of the IPM tools and technologies exercise not reach the implementation phase due to practical limitations such as a loftier toll of commercialization or lack of involvement in its adoption.
Planning and Organisation
This component deals with the management aspect of the new IPM model for data collection, organization, and bodily actions against pest infestations.
Pest Monitoring
Regularly monitoring the fields for pest occurrence and spread is a basic pace in crop protection. Early detection in many cases can help address the pest state of affairs by low-cost spot treatment or removal of pests or infested or infected plant material. When pest infestations continue to grow, regular monitoring is necessary to appraise the damage and determine the time to initiate farm-wide control. Monitoring is also important to avoid calendar-based pesticide applications especially at lower pest populations that practice not warrant treatments. For example, sampling-based fumigation forth with improved sanitation and other practices can be an economical alternative to calendar-based fumigation of wheat in elevators (Adam et al. 2010). During many conversations with growers and colleagues in extension, it appeared that thorough scouting or decision-making solely based on scouting are not possible due to the lack of resources. Still, drone-assisted aeriform imagery for pest detection and identification or to locate areas that are exposed to biotic or abiotic stressors tin can meliorate the monitoring efficiency and precision (Vanegas et al. 2018, Yue et al. 2018). Some of these tools are already available for commercial use.
Managing Information
A good recordkeeping about pests, their damage, effective treatments, seasonal fluctuations, interactions with environmental factors, irrigation practices, plant nutrition, and other related information from year to year will build the institutional knowledge on a farm and prepares the grower to take preventive or curative deportment.
Corrective Actions
Taking a timely activity is probably the most important attribute of IPM. Even with all the cognition virtually the pest and availability of resources for its effective management, losses can be prevented only when cosmetic actions are taken at the right time. Good farm management will let the grower to act in a timely manner. These actions are not but necessary to prevent damage on a particular farm, simply too to prevent the spread to neighboring farms. When pest direction is neglected on a farm, it can spread to neighboring farms and become an area-broad problem with larger regulatory, social, and economical implications.
Communication
Good advice to transfer the individual or commonage knowledge for the do good of anybody is the last component of the new IPM model. Modern and traditional communication tools tin can exist used for outreach equally researchers develop information about endemic and invasive pests, emerging threats, and new control strategies.
Staying Informed
Growers and pest control professionals should stay informed about existing and emerging pests and their management options. Science-based information can be obtained by attending extension meetings, webinars, or workshops, reading the newsletter, trade, extension, or scientific journal manufactures, and keeping in bear on with researchers and other professionals through various communication channels. There are several online resource from universities and other reputed institutions and smartphone applications that provide regular updates (Dara 2016). Well-informed growers can be well prepared to address pest issues. Keeping abreast with pest issues and their management trends is also very important for researchers and extension professionals as they develop and disseminate new strategies.
Communication Inside the Group
Educating farm coiffure through periodical preparation or communication will assist with all aspects of pest management, proper pesticide handling, ensuring worker prophylactic, and preventing environmental contamination. Knowledgeable field crews will be able to identify and monitor pest problems and effectively execute the direction strategies.
Advice Amid Growers
Although certain crop production and protection strategies are considered proprietary data, sharing noesis and resources with each other will ameliorate pest command efficacy and benefit the entire grower community. Pests do not accept boundaries and tin can spread to multiple fields when they are non effectively managed throughout the region. Growers in developing countries feel that collective activity is required for IPM implementation as in that location is a lack of sufficient knowledge (Parsa et al. 2014).
Communication With the Public
Public demand is influenced by retail marketing strategies, concerns for food safety based on pesticide regulations in their region, and a lack of knowledge on food production amid other factors. During multiple outreach meetings and field tours organized exclusively for the public in Southern California during the past few years, it was axiomatic that a majority was not enlightened of farming systems, had misunderstanding about sustainable agriculture, and believed that organic food is pesticide-free (Dara personal observations and unpublished survey data). They indicated a change in their cognition and a potential change in their behavior in making food choices following the discussions and field tours. Educating public will help their understanding of and preference for organic, conventional, or sustainably produced food as well as influence policy and regulatory decisions in their regions to ensure food condom and security.
Enquiry and Outreach
Research and outreach are an integral part of the IPM model to identify and anticipate pest bug, develop preventive and curative strategies, and effectively disseminate the data through traditional and modern communication tools and strategies. United States Ecology Protection Bureau (US EPA 2018) recognizes education and outreach equally the key factors in IPM implementation. A written report conducted by Parsa et al. (2014) involving IPM professionals and practitioners from 96 countries revealed that inadequate training and technical back up as major obstacle for IPM implementation. Cameron (2007) identified that science-based solutions and extension services are critical for IPM implementation in vegetables and fruits in New Zealand. Developing science-based information through practical inquiry, constructive outreach based on the socioeconomic and demographic structure of the clientele, networking and communication skills of extension educators, and reputation of researchers and extension educators play an important function in educating IPM practitioners.
In addition to the inquiry and outreach foundation and the four components of management, factors that influence assisting, prophylactic, and affordable food production at a larger scale and their implications for global food security should also be included in an IPM model. There are 2 layers surrounding these four components addressing the business and sustainable aspects of food production.
Business concern Attribute
Consumers desire nutritious, healthy, and tasty produce that is free of pest damage at affordable prices. Growers try to meet this demand by producing nutrient that meets all the consumer needs, while maintaining environmental and human condom, and nevertheless being able to make a profit. Sellers evaluate the market demand and strategize their sales to satisfy consumers while making their own profit to stay in the business organization. In an ideal system, consumer, producer, and seller would maintain a harmonious balance of nutrient production and sale. In such a organisation, nutrient is safe and affordable to everyone, there will be food security all over the world, and both growers and sellers brand a good profit with minimal gamble to the environment in the process of food production. Withal, this remainder is frequently disrupted due to one) consumers' misunderstanding of diverse food production systems, their demand for perfectly shaped fruits and vegetables at affordable prices, or their willingness to pay a premium toll for food items that are perceived to be rubber, two) growers trying to observe economical means of producing high-quality food while facing with continuous pest problems and other challenges, and three) sellers trying to market organic nutrient at a college cost as a safer alternative to conventionally produced nutrient. If growers implement good IPM strategies to produce prophylactic food and consumers are aware of this do and have confidence in food produced in an IPM-based organization, so sellers would be able to market what informed-consumers need. Extension traditionally focused on educating the growers and those involved in food product, but public teaching on the importance of IPM tin accept a significant influence on the manner food is produced.
Sustainability Aspect
IPM is an approach to ensure economic viability at both consumer and producer level (seller is e'er expected to make a profit), ecology safety through a counterbalanced apply of all available pest command options, and social acceptability since IPM-based food is condom and affordable.
Although organic food production is generally perceived as safe and sustainable, the post-obit examples can explain why it is not necessarily truthful. Organic nutrient production is not pesticide-costless and some of the pesticides used in an organic organisation are as harmful to humans and nontarget organisms every bit some chemical pesticides. For example, pyrethrins are highly toxic to love bees, fish, and aquatic invertebrates (NPIC 2014). Certain organically accustomed pesticides have toxins or natural chemic molecules that are very similar to those in synthetic pesticides. In fact, some synthetic pesticides (e.grand., synthetic pyrethroids vs pyrethrins and neonicotinoids vs nicotine) are manufactured imitating the pesticidal molecules of natural origin. Pests develop resistance to biopesticides just as they develop resistance to chemical pesticides. Arthropod resistance to abamectin (Stumpf and Nauen 2002), B. thuringiensis formulations or its cry toxins in genetically modified crops (Hama et al. 1992, Tabashnik et al. 2013), spinosad (Scott 2008), and other biopesticides (Dara 2017) are well documented. Kaolin particle films used in organic farming might control some pests, but tin negatively impact natural enemies and cause other pests to proliferate (Markó et al. 2008). Organic farming practices might encourage natural enemy populations, merely a college number of natural enemies does not e'er result in pest suppression (Dara 2014). Mechanical pest control practices such as vacuuming or tilling utilize fossil fuels and indirectly have a negative impact on the environment. For instance, diesel fuel-powered tractors are operated for vacuuming western tarnished bug in strawberry 2–3 times or more each week while a pesticide awarding typically requires the employ of tractor once every 7–xiv d. To command certain pests, multiple applications of organic pesticides might exist necessary with associated costs and risks, while similar pest populations could exist controlled by fewer chemical pesticide applications. It is very difficult to manage certain plant diseases and arthropod pests through nonchemical means in some crops (Flinckh et al. 2006). Inadequate control not only leads to ingather losses, but can result in their spread to larger areas making their control even more hard. Manure commonly used in organic farms can have a bigger carbon footprint, and nitrate shortage in the root zone and nitrate leaching are mutual in organic farms (Tal 2018). A meta-assay of European research by Tuomisto et al. (2012) identified both positive and negative impacts of organic farming in terms of nutrient direction and emphasized the need to improve both organic and conventional systems for reducing negative environmental impacts and increasing yields. Many growers prefer a good IPM-based production to an organic production for the ease of operation and profitability. However, they go along to produce organic food to stay in business. Multiple conversations with the strawberry and vegetable growers in the Central Declension region of California indicated that they produce organically to come across the marketplace demand, but they prefer a system where they can apply nonorganic options when and as needed (Dara unpublished information). Growers in Bangladesh, Haiti, Moldova, and Myanmar, during training programs organized past the U.S. Bureau for International Evolution, shared that organic farming is more challenging than conventional farming especially for pest direction, but they produce organically because of high returns (personal communication). A modest study conducted in the United Kingdom reported that organic growers had ecocentric reasons for protecting the environment while conventional growers had anthropocentric reasons to ensure nutrient security (Kings and Ilbery 2011). However, a more recent review article thoroughly compared organic and conventional farming approaches at the global level (Tal 2018). When the productivity, biodiversity, water quality, off-site environmental impacts, carbon footprint, climatic change, and other aspects were compared, carefully run conventional farming appears to be more sustainable than organic farming. Compared to organic farming or a conventional farming with non-ecocentric approach, a conventional organisation based on IPM principles and focused on sustainability is safety, profitable, and applied (Dara 2018b).
While middle and upper-grade consumers may be willing to pay higher prices for organically produced nutrient, many of the low-income groups in developed and underdeveloped countries cannot afford such food. Organic food production can lead to social inequality and a faux sense of well-existence for those can afford. Nutritional quality of organic foods is more for sure nutrients, while it is more for conventional foods for others (Worthington 2001, Dangour et al. 2009, Bourn and Prescott 2010, Popa et al. 2018). Although subjective well-being is reported from organic food consumption (Apaolaza et al. 2018), the show of health benefits from the nutritional quality of organic foods is nonetheless to be validated (Dangour et al. 2009, Bourn and Prescott 2010). Food security for the growing world population is necessary through optimizing input costs, minimizing wastage, grower adoption of safe and sustainable practices, and consumer confidence in food produced through such practices. IPM addresses all the economic, environmental, and social aspects and provides safety and affordable nutrient to the consumers and profits to producers and sellers, while maintaining environmental wellness.
Conclusions
Earlier IPM models are designed from the scientific perspective with a focus on ecological, environmental and evolutionary aspects of pest management to reduce or preclude economic losses. There was express telescopic to include the homo, social, business organization, and advice aspects of the total equation in the previous models that may be scarce in effective promotion and implementation of IPM. Several examples discussed in this paper showed the influence of these factors on development, outreach, and successful implementation of IPM practices effectually the world. Since IPM is a part of agronomics, which is a consumer-oriented enterprise, and agriculture is a part of global merchandise, which is influenced past several other factors, IPM is redefined for the modern times where advanced agricultural technologies and advice tools play a critical role in nutrient production and consumption. Although the 2 outer layers in the new model can be applicable to more than pest management, they do accept a significant influence on IPM within the unabridged ingather production and are the driving force for farming operations. Agricultural researchers, educators, sociologists, economists, business analysts, managers, growers, pest management professionals, agricultural input manufacturers, retailers, and consumers play a disquisitional part in food product. By reconfiguring the components and including various factors that influence them, the new IPM model provides a template for focusing on different areas of the image and to encourage collaboration among different disciplines. This new model is expected to guide IPM strategies effectually the globe to develop and implement sustainable agricultural practices to ensure profitability for the growers, affordability to consumers, and nutrient security to the growing world population.
References Cited
Adam
,
B. D.
, G. Siaplay P. W. Flinn B. W. Brorsen T. W. Phillips
2010
.
Factors influencing economic profitability of sampling-based integrated pest management of wheat in country elevators
.
J. Stored Prod. Res
.
46
:
186
–
196
.
Apaolaza
,
5.
, P. Hartmann C. D'Souza C. M. López
2018
.
Eat organic – experience good? The relationship betwixt organic food consumption, health business organisation and subjective wellbeing
.
Food Qual. Preference
63
:
51
–
62
.
Asante
,
S. 1000.
, K. Tamo L. E. Northward. Jackai
2001
.
Integrated management of cowpea insect pests using elite cultivars, date of planting and minimum insecticide application
.
Afr. Crop Sci. J
.
9
:
655
–
665
.
Bourn
,
D.
, and J. Prescott
2010
.
A comparison of the nutritional value, sensory qualities, and food rubber of organically and conventionally produced foods
.
Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr
.
42
:
one
–
34
.
Cameron
,
P. J
.
2007
.
Factors influencing the development of integrated pest direction (IPM) in selected vegetable crops: a review
.
N.Z. J. Crop Hort. Sci
.
35
:
365
–
384
.
Cardé
,
R. T.
, and A. K. Minks
1995
.
Control of moth pests by mating disruption: successes and constraints
.
Annu. Rev. Entomol
.
xl
:
559
–
585
.
Chu
,
C.-C.
, J. L. Spencer M. J. Curzi J. A. Zavala Grand. J. Seufferheld
2013
.
Gut bacteria facilitate accommodation to crop rotation in the western corn rootworm
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
.
110
:
11917
–
11922
.
Curl
,
E. A
.
1963
.
Control of constitute diseases by ingather rotation
.
The Botanical Review
29
:
413
–
479
.
Dangour
,
A. D.
, S. K. Dodhia A. Hayter E. Allen K. Lock R. Uauy
2009
.
Nutritional quality of organic foods: a systematic review
.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr
.
90
:
680
–
685
.
Dara
,
S. One thousand
.
2018a
.
Evaluation of additive, soil amendment, and biostimulant products in Santa Maria strawberry
.
CAPCA Adviser
21
:
44
–
l
.
Dara
,
S. K
.
2018b
.
Safe, profitable, and applied label for sustainable production and nutrient security
.
Progressive Crop Consultant
3
:
20
–
23
.
Dara
,
S. K.
, S. Sandoval-Solis D. Peck
2016
.
Improving strawberry irrigation with micro-sprinklers and their touch on pest management
.
Agronomical Sciences
7
:
859
–
868
.
Dara
,
S. Thou.
, D. Peck D. Murray
2018
.
Chemical and non-chemical options for managing twospotted spider mite, western tarnished constitute bug and other arthropod pests in strawberries
.
Insects
9
:
156
.
Davis
,
J. Fifty.
, P. Armengaud T. R. Larson I. A. Graham P. J. White A. C. Newton A. Amtmann
2018
.
Contrasting nutrient-disease relationships: potassium gradients in barley leaves take contrary furnishings on two fungal pathogens with dissimilar sensitivities to jasmonic acid
.
Plant. Cell Environ
.
41
:
2357
–
2372
.
Dodia
,
D. A.
, I. S. Patel Grand. M. Patel
2010
.
Botanical pesticides for pest management
.
Scientific Publishers (India)
,
Jodhpur, India
.
Dong
,
50. Q.
, and K. Q. Zhang
2006
.
Microbial command of plant-parasitic nematodes: a five-party interaction
.
Institute Soil
288
:
31
–
45
.
Dosdall
,
50. One thousand.
, M. J. Herbut Northward. T. Cowle T. M. Micklich
1996
.
The result of seeding date and plant density on infestations of root maggots, Delia spp. (Diptera: Anthomyiidae), in canola
.
Can. J. Establish Sci
.
76
:
169
–
177
.
Douglas
,
A. Eastward
.
2018
.
Strategies for enhanced crop resistance to insect pests
.
Annu. Rev. Institute Biol
.
69
:
637
–
660
.
El-Sayed
,
A. M.
, D. M. Suckling J. A. Byers Due east. B. Jang C. H. Wearing
2009
.
Potential of "lure and kill" in long-term pest management and eradication of invasive species
.
J. Econ. Entomol
.
102
:
815
–
835
.
Flinckh
,
One thousand. R.
, E. Schulte-Geldermann C. Burns
2006
.
Challenges to organic potato farming: disease and nutrient management
.
Potato Res
.
49
:
27
–
42
.
Foster
,
South. P.
, and M. O. Harris
1997
.
Behavioral manipulation methods for insect pest-management
.
Annu. Rev. Entomol
.
42
:
123
–
146
.
Gamliel
,
A.
, and J. Katan
2012
.
Solarization: theory and practice
.
American Phytopathological Order
,
St. Paul, MN
.
Georghiou
,
G. P
.
1983
.
Pest resistance to pesticides
.
Springer US
,
New York, NY
.
Gogo
,
E. O.
, M. Saidi J. One thousand. Ochieng T. Martin V. Baird Thousand. Ngouajio
2014
.
Microclimate modification and insect pest exclusion using agronet improve pod yield and quality of French edible bean
.
HortScience
49
:
1298
–
1304
.
Gordon
,
Thou. H.
, and P. M. Waterhouse
2007
.
RNAi for insect-proof plants
.
Nat. Biotechnol
.
25
:
1231
–
1232
.
Gray
,
M. East.
, T. W. Sappington Due north. J. Miller J. Moeser Chiliad. O. Bohn
2013
.
Accommodation and invasiveness of western corn rootworm: intensifying inquiry on a worsening pest
.
Annu. Rev. Entomol
.
54
:
303
–
321
.
Hajek
,
A. Due east.
, and J. Eilenberg
2018
.
Natural enemies: an introduction to biological control
.
Cambridge University Printing
,
Cambridge, United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland
.
Hama
,
H.
, K. Suzuki H. Tanaka
1992
.
Inheritance and stability of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis formulations of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae)
.
Appl. Entomol. Zool
.
27
:
355
–
362
.
Heimpel
,
G. Eastward.
, and M. J. Westward. Cock
2018
.
Shifting paradigms in the history of classical biological control
.
BioControl
63
:
27
–
37
.
Heinz
,
K. 1000.
, Chiliad. P. Parrella J. P. Newman
1992
.
Time-efficient apply of yellow sticky traps in monitoring insect populations
.
J. Econ. Entomol
.
85
:
2263
–
2269
.
Hillocks
,
R. J
.
2012
.
Farming with fewer pesticides: EU pesticide review and resulting challenges for UK agriculture
.
Crop Prot
.
31
:
85
–
93
.
Hodson
,
A. 1000.
, and B. D. Lampinen
2018
.
Effects of cultivar and leaf traits on the abundance of Pacific spider mites in almond orchards
.
Arthropod Plant Interact
.
1
–
11
. doi:
Huang
,
F.
, D. A. Andow L. L. Buschman
2011
.
Success of the high-dose/refuge resistance management strategy later 15 years of Bt crop use in Due north America
.
Entomol. Exp. Appl
.
140
:
1
–
sixteen
.
Jayasooriya
,
H. J. C.
, and Thou. M. M. Aheeyar
2016
.
Adoption and factors affecting on adoption of integrated pest direction amid vegetable farmers in Sri Lanka
.
Procedia Food Sci
.
6
:
208
–
212
.
Karungi
,
J.
, East. Adipala K. W. Ogenga-Latigo Southward. Kyamanywa N. Oyobo
2000
.
Pest management in cowpea. Office i. Influence of planting time and plant density on cowpea field pests infestation in eastern Uganda
.
Crop Prot
.
19
:
231
–
236
.
Kenis
,
M.
, B. P. Hurley A. E. Hajek M. J. W. Cock
2017
.
Classical biological control of insect pests of trees: facts and figures
.
Biol. Invasions
19
:
3401
–
3417
.
Kennedy
,
G. G
.
2008
.
Integration of insect-resistant genetically modified crops inside IPM programs,
pp.
1
–
26
. In J. Romeis A. Shelton G. Kennedy
Integration of insect-resistant genetically modified crops within IPM programs
.
Springer
,
Dordrecht, Holland
.
Kings
,
D.
, and B. Ilbery
2011
.
Farmers' attitudes towards organic and conventional agronomics: a behaviroural perspective,
pp.
145
–
168
. In G. Reed
Organic food and agriculture: new trends and developments in the social sciences
.
InTech Open up Access Publishers
,
Rijeka, Republic of croatia
.
Klassen
,
W.
, and C. F. Curtis
2005
.
History of the sterile insect technique,
pp.
three
–
36
. In 5. A. Dyck J. Hendrichs A. Robinson
Sterile insect technique
.
Springer
,
Dordrecht, The Netherlands
.
Kunjwal
,
N.
, and R. M. Srivastava
2018
.
Insect pests of vegetables,
pp.
163
–
221
. In
Omkar
(ed.),
Pests and their direction
.
Springer
,
Singapore
.
Lacey
,
L. A
.
2017
.
Microbial control of insect and mite pests: from theory to practice
.
Bookish Press
,
London, Britain
.
Larkin
,
R. P
.
2008
.
Relative effects of biological amendments and crop rotations on soil microbial communities and soilborne diseases of potato
.
Soil Biol. Biochem
.
40
:
1341
–
1351
.
Lasota
,
J. A.
, and R. A. Dybas
1991
.
Avermectins, a novel course of compounds: implications for utilise in arthropod pest control
.
Annu. Rev. Entomol
.
36
:
91
–
117
.
Leach
,
H. J.
Moses E. Hanson P. Fanning R. Isaacs
2017
.
Rapid harvest schedules and fruit removal as not-chemical approaches for managing spotted fly Drosophila
.
J. Pest Sci
.
91
:
219
–
226
.
Lefebvre
,
M.
, S. R. H. Langrell Due south. Gomez-y-Paloma
2015
.
Incentives and policies for integrated pest direction in Europe: a review
.
Agron. Sustainable Dev
.
35
:
27
–
45
.
van Lenteren
,
J. C
.
1988
.
Biological and integrated pest control in greenhouses
.
Annu. Rev. Entomol
.
33
:
239
–
269
.
Liebman
,
M.
, and East. Dyck
1993
.
Crop rotation and intercropping strategies for weed management
.
Ecol. Appl
.
3
:
92
–
122
.
López-Bucio
,
J.
, R. Pelagio-Flores A. Herrera-Estrella
2015
.
Trichoderma as biostimulant: exploiting the multilevel properties of a plant beneficial mucus
.
Sci. Horticult
.
196
:
109
–
123
.
Mankau
,
R
.
1981
.
Microbial control of nematodes,
pp.
475
–
494
. In B. Zuckerman R. A. Rohde
Plant parasitic nematodes
, Vol.
3
.
Bookish Printing
,
New York, NY
.
Markó
,
V.
, L. H. K. Blommers Due south. Bogy H. Helsen
2008
.
Kaolin particle films suppress many apple tree pests, disrupt natural enemies and promote woolly apple aphid
.
J. Appl. Entomol
.
132
:
26
–
35
.
Mehrnejad
,
M. R
.
2018
.
Investigation into the overwintering and winter-management of the mutual pistachio psyllid, Agonoscena pistaciae (Hemiptera: Aphalaridae), a major pest in pistachio plantations
.
Zoology and Ecology
28
:
384
–
388
.
Mitchell
,
C. Eastward.
, P. B. Reich D. Tilman J. 5. Groth
2003
.
Effects of elevated CO2, nitrogen degradation, and decreased species diverseness on foliar fungal plant disease
.
Global Change Biol
.
3
:
438
–
451
.
Mohler
,
C. L.
, and S. E. Johnson
2009
.
Crop rotation on organic farms a planning manual
.
Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service
,
Ithaca, NY
.
Morrison
,
Due west. R.
, D.-H. Lee B. D. Short A. Khrimian T. C. Leskey
2016
.
Establishing the behavioral basis for an attract-and-kill strategy to manage the invasive Halyomorpha halys in apple orchards
.
J. Pest Sci
.
89
:
81
–
96
.
Nelson
,
R.
, T. Wiesner-Hanks R. Wisser P. Balint-Kurti
2018
.
Navigating complexity to breed disease-resistant crops
.
Nat. Rev. Genet
.
19
:
21
–
33
.
Nielsen
,
A. Fifty.
, Grand. Dively J. M. Pote G. Zinati C. Mathews
2016
.
Identifying a potential trap crop for a novel insect pest, Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), in organic farms
.
Environ. Entomol
.
45
:
472
–
478
.
Parsa
,
Southward.
, S. Morse A. Bonifacio T. C. B. Chancellor B. Condori V. Crespo-Pérez S. Fifty. A. Hobbs J. Kroschel M. Northward. Ba F. Rebaudo
2014
.
Obstacles to integrated pest direction adoption in developing countries
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. UsA
.
eleven
:
3889
–
3894
.
Paulitz
,
T. C.
, and R. R. Bélanger
2001
.
Biological command in greenhouse systems
.
Annu. Rev. Phytopathol
.
39
:
103
–
133
.
Peterson
,
R. Grand. D.
, Fifty. G. Higley L. P. Pedigo
2018
.
Whatever happened to IPM?
Am. Entomol
.
64
:
146
–
150
.
Pimental
,
D
.
2009
.
Pesticides and pest command,
pp.
83
–
87
. In R. Peshin A. K. Dhawan
Integrated pest direction: innovation-evolution process
.
Springer
,
Dordrecht, The Netherlands
.
Popa
,
M. East. A. C.
Mitelut East. E. Popa A. Stan V. I. Popa
2018
.
Organic foods contribution to nutritional quality and value
.
Trends Food Sci. Technol
. 84: 15–18. doi:
Poston
,
F. L.
, L. P. Pedigo S. G. Welch
1983
.
Economical injury levels: reality and practicality
.
Am. Entomol
.
29
:
49
–
53
.
Pretty
,
J.
, and Z. P. Bharucha
2015
.
Integrated pest direction for sustainable intensification of agriculture in Asia and Africa
.
Insects
.
6
:
152
–
182
.
Rezaei
,
R.
, L. Safa C. A. Damalas One thousand. G. Ganjkhanloo
2019
.
Drivers of farmers' intention to apply integrated pest management: integrating theory of planned beliefs and norm activation model
.
J. Environ. Manage
.
236
:
328
–
339
.
Sarfraz
,
Grand.
, L. Grand. Dosdall B. A. Keddie
2005
.
Spinosad: a promising tool for integrated pest direction
.
Outlooks on Pest Management
16
:
78
–
84
.
Scott
,
J. G
.
2008
.
Unraveling the mystery of spinosad resistance in insects
.
J. Pestic. Sci
.
33
:
221
–
227
.
Sharma
,
H. S.
, C. Fleming C. Selby J. R. Rao T. Martin
2014
.
Plant biostimulants: a revie on the processing of macroalgae and use of extracts for crop management to reduce abiotic and biotic stresses
.
J. Appl. Phycol
.
26
:
465
–
490
.
Shorey
,
H. H.
, and R. Thou. Gerber
1996
.
Apply of puffers for disruption of sexual practice pheromone communication amidst navel orangeworm moths (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in almonds, pistachios, and walnuts
.
Environ. Entomol
.
25
:
1154
–
1157
.
Snoeijers
,
Southward. S.
, A. Pérez-García M. H. A. J. Joosten P. J. G. 1000. De Wit
2000
.
The effect of nitrogen on disease development and cistron expression in bacterial and fungal constitute pathogens
.
Eur. J. Establish Pathol
.
106
:
493
–
506
.
Sparks
,
T. C.
, and R. Nauen
2015
.
IRAC: mode of action classification and insecticide resistance management
.
Pestic. Biochem. Physiol
.
121
:
122
–
128
.
Stenberg
,
J. A
.
2017
.
A conceptual framework for integrated pest management
.
Trends Plant Sci
.
22
:
749
–
769
.
Stumpf
,
N.
, and R. Nauen
2002
.
Biochemical markers linked to abamectin resistance in Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)
.
Pestic. Biochem. Physiol
.
72
:
111
–
121
.
Swezey
,
Southward. L.
, D. J. Nieto J. A. Bryer
2007
.
Command of western tarnished plant problems Lygus hesperus Knight (Hemiptera: Miridae) in California organic strawberries using alfalfa trap crops and tractor-mounted vacuums
.
Environ. Entomol
.
36
:
1457
–
1465
.
Tabashnik
,
B. E.
, T. Brévault Y. Carrière
2013
.
Insect resistance to Bt crops: lessons from the kickoff billion acres
.
Nat. Biotechnol
.
31
:
510
–
521
.
Tal
,
A
.
2018
.
Making conventional agriculture environmentally friendly: moving beyond the glorification of organic agriculture and the demonization of conventional agriculture
.
Sustainability
ten
:
1079
.
Tang
,
J. D.
, H. L. Collins T. D. Metz E. D. Earle J. Z. Zhao R. T. Roush A. M. Shelton
2001
.
Greenhouse tests on resistance management of Bt transgenic plants using refuge strategies
.
J. Econ. Entomol
.
94
:
240
–
247
.
Tuomisto
,
H. L.
, I. D. Hodge P. Riordan D. W. Macdonald
2012
.
Does organic farming reduce environmental impacts?–a meta-assay of European research
.
J. Environ. Manage
.
112
:
309
–
320
.
Vanegas
,
F.
, D. Bratanov K. Powell J. Weiss F. Gonzalez
2018
.
A novel methodology for improving constitute pest surveillance in vineyards and crops using UAV-based hyperspectral and spatial data
.
Sensors
18
:
260
.
Vladés
,
Due east. Yard. A. Eastward.
, L. L. L. Aldana B. R. Figueroa O. 1000. Gutiérrez R. 1000. C. Hernández M. T. Chavelas
2005
.
Trapping of Scyphophorus acupunctatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) with two natural baits in a field of Polianthes tuberosa (Liliales: Agavaceae) in the state of Morelos, México
.
Fla. Entomol
.
88
:
338
–
340
.
Vleesschauwer
,
D. D.
, and K. Höfte
2009
.
Rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance
.
Adv. Bot. Res
.
51
:
223
–
281
.
Webb
,
S. Due east.
, and Southward. B. Linda
1992
.
Evaluation of spunbonded polyethylene row covers equally a method of excluding insects and viruses affecting autumn-grown squash in Florida
.
J. Econ. Entomol
.
85
:
2344
–
2352
.
Worthington
,
V
.
2001
.
Nutritional quality of organic versus conventional fruits, vegetables, and grains
.
J. Altern. Complement. Med
.
7
:
161
–
173
.
Wright
,
R. J
.
1984
.
Evaluation of crop rotation for control of Colorado tater beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in commercial potato fields on Long Isle
.
J. Econ. Entomol
.
77
:
1254
–
1259
.
Yue
,
Y.
, X. Cheng D. Zhang Y. Wu Y. Zhao Y. Chen G. Fan Y. Zhang
2018
.
Deep recursive super resolution network with Laplacian Pyramid for better agronomical pest surveillance and detection
.
Comput. Electron. Agric
.
150
:
26
–
32
.
Zalom
,
F. G.
, Thousand. P. Bolda S. Yard. Dara Southward. Joseph
2018
.
UC IPM pest management guidelines: strawberry (insects and mites)
.
Academy of California Statewide IPM Plan
,
Oakland, CA
, Publication Number 3468.
© The Writer(south) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Eatables Attribution Not-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/four.0/), which permits non-commercial re-utilise, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
Source: https://academic.oup.com/jipm/article/10/1/12/5480541
0 Response to "How Longs It Takes to Get Review in Pest Management Science"
Publicar un comentario